In Reimagining Writing Assessment, I attempt to put a writer’s experience and needs consciously at the center of what writing assessment should be.
As it turns out, the experiences and needs of writers is a radical starting point for writing assessment theory and practice. Most assessment theory and practice has been guided by institutional concerns and a very coherent vision for social, economic, and educational stratification. In fact, assessment is key to the realization of this vision because it functions as the mechanism for determining how we allocate our collective resources and opportunities. We’d be wise to consider what this vision is, where and why it began in the first place, and where it leads. Otherwise, we run the risk of unwittingly participating in a system that violates our values.
The alternative assessment practices I will describe in this book will not neatly replace the rubric and appease the systems of account- ability that currently shape assessment. That’s because they serve different interests than those served by the accountability movement. In the ten years since Rethinking Rubrics was published, I’ve researched the ideas and historical figures that have shaped this societal vision and limited our conception of what assessment can be. I’ll relate some of that story to help explain why true alternatives are so doggedly difficult to create and sustain—and why it is so critically important that we do so.
— From the Introduction